You're probably thinking that but that is literally what takes place in a game, so what's the problem with that? And you'd be absolutely correct. The question is, however, what would happen if I were to take LeBron's place. In the NBA, what kind of stats would I get? Not my MyPlayer, but rather the actual version of myself? Probably around 20. I believe that I could get by with 20. I have a reasonable amount of stamina for someone of my age, and because I've spent some time playing netball, I have excellent fundamentals. Yes, yes, I am aware of it as well; however, if you could do me a tremendous favor, you could say that my overall rating is ten.

In a real game, Steph Curry would give me that irksome smile he gives when he already knows he's made another three-pointer, and then he'd slap the ball out of my hand with such force that I'd never be able to write again. In contrast, if the content game did not contain any animated attractions, I would have a much simpler time getting by Steph. All I would have to do is wiggle my character back and forth until I was in the space between him and the hoop. I was a Wing Defense in netball, and I've never been very good at shooting the ball. As a result, I never scored any goals. But I'd get past him just fine.

You can see this in action in a variety of other sporting events as well. Jonah Lomu Although rugby is the greatest sport ever played, it is possible to score points at will by taking advantage of the fact that there is no magnetism involved. You could also just hand the ball to Jonah Lomu and score whenever you wanted, but that was an extremely realistic option.

The NBA 2K series adds a stickiness to the collision detection, which holds players together on the court and helps prevent this problem from occurring. The first scenario involves LeBron James running toward Stephen Curry and then "snapping" to him. The game has always been dexterous enough to represent the many tools at LeBron's disposal for getting by defenders, but in 2K23 it feels better than it ever has for him to simply disengage from the animation lock in order to move on by. The game has always been dexterous enough to represent the many tools at LeBron's disposal for getting by defenders.

We are currently in the era of the small ball, and it is difficult to demonstrate the high-rotational, fast-paced basketball that is so popular these days if none of the players are able to move because they are stuck to one another..."

In my opinion, it is a tremendous advancement, and one that calls for a very deft hand to accomplish. If you deviate too far in either direction, either players will easily be able to exploit it for free points or the game will devolve into big men backing down defenders in the post so that they can take high percentage shots near the rim. That is not how NBA basketball is played in the 2022-2023 season. It is obvious that Joel Embiid, Nikola Jokic, and other big men are able to do this, but we are currently in the small ball era, and it is difficult to showcase the fast-paced, high rotational basketball that is so popular these days if none of the players can move because they are stuck to one another.

Having said that, there is certainly room for further development. The AI has not evolved in line with modern standards. It is strange to hear the commentary team talk about how switching on defense is so common in today's NBA when the AI still refuses to actually do it, and even when they do decide they want to switch, they do so too late and on the wrong player.

In regard to switching and artificial intelligence, 2K23 still has a significant issue with automatically switching control to the defender who is closest to the ball. NBA2K23 MT Coins becomes most obvious in game modes in which there are fewer than five players on each team. For example, in three-on-three matches, choosing who you want to defend with can feel very much like the result of a coin toss.

The paranoid side of me can't help but wonder if they did it on purpose. You spend a lot of time playing 3 on 3 basketball in MyTeam, which is a collectible card game and a gambling simulator in NBA 2K23. If changing players was random, it would be easy to tilt the scales a little bit to close the gap in a game that's already a blowout, right? Because I am aware that these kinds of games are constructed on a basis of psychological deception, I tend to interpret every mistake as if it were done on purpose. This is the downside to playing these kinds of games. Oh, Giannis Antetekoumpo just happened to leave Anthony Davis wide open so that he could jack up the three that would cost me one MyTeam Buck because it lowered the win margin by one extra point, is that right? What a perfect fit! Despite having Joel Embiid camped out around the basket like he's Yogi Bear, my green light three that would have sealed the game happened to clang off the rim and into their hands. Without a doubt.

When the mode itself is constructed from the ground up around the concept of compartmentalizing losses, why wouldn't I delegate away any mistakes?

- Do we all have a common understanding of this

- The structure of MyTeam is based on these three pillars

- There is a gambling element, which appears to be self-evident; card packs are merely loot boxes; there is an actual wheel that you spin for prizes; unlocking a vault suggests a degree of value that does not exist; etc

- If you are going to open a pack of cards and "win" one of them, let's say Giannis, then you might as well play a game with him to see how things turn out

- After all, his name is Giannis

Then there's the sunk cost fallacy, which misleads us into thinking that we will have a poor return on investment if we don't keep playing, despite the fact that playing is an investment of time in and of itself, and that even as we try to extract a sufficient return on investment, we are still investing.